It's the Chicago Way

I don't know why I'm surprised. It was only a matter of time before the White House started directly threatening opponents of its policies.

I guess what surprises me most is how brazen the threat was:

A leading bankruptcy attorney representing hedge funds and money managers told ABC News Saturday that Steve Rattner, the leader of the Obama administration's Auto Industry Task Force, threatened one of the firms, an investment bank, that if it continued to oppose the administration's Chrysler bankruptcy plan, the White House would use the White House press corps to destroy its reputation.

This should concern everyone, especially you hippies who like to preach about the evils of your government.

Kudos to ABC's Tapper for bothering to report on a story that even has the mere possibility of casting The One in a bad light. Is investigative journalism still alive?

Andy McCarthy Tells Obama and DOJ to Pound Sand

Awesome. Just awesome. Former U.S. Attorney Andrew McCarthy penned a brilliant response to the Obama DOJ, in which he declined an invitation to participate in the dog-and-pony show that is Obama & Co.'s Task Force on Detention Policy on May 4th.

Soooo many money quotes. But here's a sampling:

I admire the lawyers of the Counterterrorism Division, and I do not question their good faith. Nevertheless, it is quite clear—most recently, from your provocative remarks on Wednesday in Germany—that the Obama administration has already settled on a policy of releasing trained jihadists (including releasing some of them into the United States). Whatever the good intentions of the organizers, the meeting will obviously be used by the administration to claim that its policy was arrived at in consultation with current and former government officials experienced in terrorism cases and national security issues. I deeply disagree with this policy, which I believe is a violation of federal law and a betrayal of the president’s first obligation to protect the American people. Under the circumstances, I think the better course is to register my dissent, rather than be used as a prop.

More:

Given your policy of conducting ruinous criminal and ethics investigations of lawyers over the advice they offer the government, and your specific position that the wartime detention I would endorse is tantamount to a violation of law, it makes little sense for me to attend the Task Force meeting. After all, my choice would be to remain silent or risk jeopardizing myself.

Finally, this one:

Obviously, I am powerless to stop the administration from releasing top al Qaeda operatives who planned mass-murder attacks against American cities—like Binyam Mohammed (the accomplice of “Dirty Bomber” Jose Padilla) whom the administration recently transferred to Britain, where he is now at liberty and living on public assistance. I am similarly powerless to stop the administration from admitting into the United States such alien jihadists as the 17 remaining Uighur detainees. According to National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair, the Uighurs will apparently live freely, on American taxpayer assistance, despite the facts that they are affiliated with a terrorist organization and have received terrorist paramilitary training. Under federal immigration law (the 2005 REAL ID Act), those facts render them excludable from the United States. The Uighurs’ impending release is thus a remarkable development given the Obama administration’s propensity to deride its predecessor’s purported insensitivity to the rule of law.

I am, in addition, powerless to stop the President, as he takes these reckless steps, from touting his Detention Policy Task Force as a demonstration of his national security seriousness. But I can decline to participate in the charade.

Do read the whole thing. The Right needs more people with cojones like McCarthy, who calls Obama's charade like he sees it.

US responsible for swine flu

CNN's crack investigation into the cause of swine flu has led them to conclude, you guessed it, it's all America's fault:

A little boy who lives in a Mexico mountain village flanked by pig farms has been named as "patient zero" in the swine flu outbreak. Five-year-old Edgar Hernandez credits ice cream for helping him feel better. Edgar and his family live in La Gloria in the state of Veracruz. His mother blames the virus on a huge, U.S.-owned pig farm in their neighborhood.

Yet another example of the evil Bush legacy.

President Dive-bombs NYC

This strikes me as something Jimmy Carter would do. The Obedient media is trying to pass it off, saying The One didn't know and was shocked, shocked to find out that it happened. I think honest people know better than to believe that.



Pure brilliance.

Plus, check out what the White House has planned for future photo ops:

Brave Bennie

The House Chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, Bennie Thompson, had this to say about the DHS report on "rightwing extremism" released to law enforcement officials across the country last week:

“This report appears to raise significant issues involving the privacy and civil liberties of many Americans — including war veterans,” Mr. Thompson said in the letter sent Tuesday.

“As I am certain you agree, freedom of association and freedom of speech are guaranteed to all Americans — whether a person’s beliefs, whatever their political orientation, are ‘extremist’ or not,” Mr. Thompson said.


"freedom of speech" and "freedom of association"? They're going to strip the (D) from his name any minute now...

Trackback

CNN Tea Party "reporting"

It speaks for itself:


CNN: "Let's see... drop taxes... drop socialism. Okay, let's see. You're here with your two-year old daughter and you're already in debt. Why are you here today, sir?"

Man with child: "Because I hear a President say that he believed in what Lincoln stood for. Lincoln's primary thing was, he believed that people had the right to liberty and the r --"

CNN: "What does this have to do with taxes?"

Man: "Are you going to let me speak?"

CNN: "What does this have to do with taxes? Do you realize that you're elibible for a $400..."

Man: "Let me finish my point! Lincoln believed that people had the right to share in the fruits of their own labor and that government should not take it. And we have clearly gotten to that p--"

CNN: "Right, right, right -- did you know that the state of Lincoln gets fifty billion dollars out of these stimulus -- that's fifty billion dollars for this state, sir!"

Man: "Ma'am, ma'am, ma'am, I'm... can you stop this, sir?"

CNN: "Alright, we'll move on... (to audience) I think you get the general tenor of this, uh, it's anti-government, anti-CNN, since this is highly promoted by the rightwing conservative network Fox and... since I can't really hear much more, I think this... is not really family viewing, toss it back to you, Kera."

anti-government?? anti-CNN?? I can't even begin to describe what's wrong with this.

Fake Turkey comes full circle

Fake Turkey has long recognized the awesomeness of "staged" military photos for propaganda purposes. Now it seems the staged photo op is en vogue with The Leader as well, as evidenced by the Iraq troop meet and greet event, sponsored by KoolAid.

Fake Turkey would like to point out again, that the Bush turkey was very real.

Hat Tip: AspenPR/HotAir

"Staged Military Photo Ops Suddenly Awesome

posted at 6:54 am on April 14, 2009 by Jim Treacher
Send to a Friend | printer-friendly

Back in 2003, the left was astonished and dismayed that George W. Bush got such a warm Thanksgiving welcome from our troops in Iraq, even after he was evil enough to send our troops to Iraq. So what did our friends on the port side do? Oh, the usual: They concocted a controversy out of whole cloth.

“Hey, that Thanksgiving turkey Bush was carrying looked pretty fake. Wait a second, I know… It was plastic! What a perfect metaphor for this whole fake war! Plastic turkey, plastic president. Am I right, people?”

They weren’t right. They didn’t even bother to find out if they were. But that didn’t stop this weird, fact-free, too-good-to-check meme from oozing through the Internet until it finally dripped onto the desks of our finest bastion of journalistic certitude, the New York Times. Here’s what Richard L. Berke said about it on July 4, 2004, in the middle of a thumbsucker about John Kerry (remember him?) trying to find some way to grab the nation’s attention. Kerry was having a tough time because, well, he’s John Kerry. But also because the wicked and nefarious George Bush kept stealing the spotlight:

And how does Mr. Kerry top the suspense-filled plot line of this White House, which regularly negotiates hairpin turns? Just last week, the handover of Iraq happened two days earlier than expected.

There are also the manufactured surprises, like Mr. Bush’s cloak-and-dagger Thanksgiving trip to Baghdad, which drew praise even from Democrats. (The public relations bonanza fizzled after the press reported that Mr. Bush had posed with a mouth-watering - but fake - turkey.)

It took a week for the NYT to issue a correction, but at least they finally did:

An article last Sunday about surprises in politics referred incorrectly to the turkey carried by President Bush during his unannounced visit to American troops in Baghdad over Thanksgiving. It was real, not fake.

Which would seem to be no small matter, considering that this “fact” was being used far and wide to triumphantly prove the fundamental fakeness of the Bush administration. But then, this is the same newspaper that, just two months later, would run the headline “Memos on Bush Are Fake but Accurate, Typist Says.” Fake, real, accurate, inaccurate… whatever!

Despite the NYT’s correction, the meme of “Bush’s plastic turkey proves he sucks and stuff” survives to this day, still popping up occasionally on the Internet and in “reputable” publications all over the world. Just ask the great Tim Blair, who has served as Turkey-Tracker #1 ever since the first outbreak of this particular form of mental illness.

Which brings us to 2009, and a new president who’s on record as saying our troops in Afghanistan are “just air-raiding villages and killing civilians” indiscriminately. A president who opposed the Iraq War and, during his brief, stepping-stone tenure as a senator, voted against the surge. A president who’s even more image-conscious than most (mainly because it’s his one and only qualification for the job), and who’s obviously stung by the rather lukewarm reception he’s received from military audiences in the early days of his presidency.

So you’re the president, you’re making a surprise visit to Iraq, and you want to look good. But so far, the troops haven’t really been falling all over themselves whenever you glide into the room. What do you do? How do you shut up those pundits who dare to take note of reality? Well, according to Macsmind:

…about that “surprise visit”.

It wasn’t. The visit was communicated a full 24 hours in advance and a small contingent of soldiers - not screaming hordes - were rustled into a meeting place at Camp Victory.

Got this email from a sergeant that was there.

We were pre-screened, asked by officials “Who voted for Obama?”, and then those who raised their hands were shuffled to the front of the receiving line. They even handed out digital cameras and asked them to hold them up.

Take a look at the picture at AP and notice all the cameras are the same models. Coincidence? I think not.

How do you make sure a crowd likes you? Screen out anybody who didn’t vote for you. Even if they’re serving their country under your watch.

Flopping Aces and Redstate have followed up on this. Will they be the only ones? Will the American press try to confirm or debunk this claim? Will it make its way to the hallowed halls of the NYT?

Guess it all depends on how eager they really are to flush out a fake turkey.

Update: Whoops, sorry, I forgot… Allegedly."

Conservative "Radicals" Beware

Warning: DHS resurrects McCarthyism.

The Department of Homeland Security is warning law enforcement officials about a rise in "rightwing extremist activity," saying the economic recession, the election of America's first black president and the return of a few disgruntled war veterans could swell the ranks of white-power militias.

A footnote attached to the report by the Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines "rightwing extremism in the United States" as including not just racist or hate groups, but also groups that reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority.

The message is clear: speak out about States' rights or say anything negative about the Federal government and the police will deal with you.

...and poof! Just like that, Federalism is radicalism.

Michelle Malkin has a complete analysis of this piece of crap.

UPDATE: Powerline has a great run down of this "intelligence" report

UPDATE2: House Committee on Homeland Security Democrat Bennie Thompson is demanding an explanation.

The World's president bows down. Warning: it's painful to watch

Come one, come all! Watch as our charismatic president bows to the king of Saudi Arabia!!



...compliments of Salon.com

"There has been one needless gaffe after another -- from the president's tacky appearance on a late-night comedy show to the kitsch gifts given to the British prime minister, followed by the sweater-clad first lady's over-familiarity with the queen and culminating in the jaw-dropping spectacle of a president of the United States bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia."

UPDATE: The White House is apparently denying that there was a bow, saying it the president was "taller than king Abdullah...", blah blah, next question. Judging by how far down he didn't bow, I'm guessing the president must be a good 4 feet taller than the king.

Better post the picture, for when the video gets pulled.


Huh?

What happened to all the outrage over warrantless wiretapping, FISA courts, illegal and unconstitutional spying on Americans, etc.?

What do the moonbats have to say for themselves now that the Obama Administration has sanctioned the very same practice of "eavesdropping on Americans??"

Obama lied, people spied?

UPDATE: Keith Olbermann (that's right) piles on!

http://nalert.blogspot.com/2009/04/keith-olbermanns-scathing-criticism-of.html

UPDATE 2: The Electronic Frontier Foundation has just said that 'In the Warrantless Wiretapping Case, Obama DOJ's New Arguments Are Worse Than Bush's". No need to read past the first line of the EFF report: "We had hoped this would go differently."